Foreign Scenario
This week, the focus should once again be the unjustifiable war between Russia and Ukraine, which, beyond humanitarian catastrophe, continues to exacerbate market volatility, disrupt global trade and supply chains, redraw global geopolitics, and amplify uncertainty about future economic prospects. Russian troops appear to be advancing at a much slower pace than desired, relying centrally on a strategy of besieging cities, depriving them of supplies, and bombing them to destruction. Hospitals, daycare centers, homes, schools, churches, civilian and military infrastructure, nothing escapes the Russian carpet of bombs. This past week, the Kremlin began mentioning, without offering evidence, that the Pentagon and the Ukrainians were preparing a biological attack against Russian separatists in the Donbas region, which led to the United States warning that possibly Russia is planning some biological or chemical attack that it intends to make it look like an accident. The future of the conflict is uncertain, as diplomatic negotiations are ongoing but without much in the way of ceasefire or humanitarian corridors, and as Ukrainian resistance has exceeded expectations.
Russia and Belarus have been the target of dozens of economic sanctions in retaliation for the invasion of Ukraine, which impairs their ability to trade with the G7 countries, either because a product is prohibited from being imported or because of the difficulty for Russian and Belarusian banks to make international payments and receipts with other countries. In addition, dozens of companies are suspending or terminating their activities with the Russians, increasing Moscow's economic isolation. Finally, there is a general discouraging effect on trade with Russia for fear of future sanctions, reputational damage, or fear of non-payment. It is also noteworthy that Moscow troops have not yet targeted the largest Ukrainian port in Odessa. However, should the Russians decide to head west and take Odessa, Ukraine would have its access to the Black Sea cut off. All these factors have contributed to an intense variation in the prices of food, metal, and energy commodities over the past fortnight, and nothing suggests that this trend will change in the coming weeks.
Another highlight of the coming week will be the meeting of the Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which on Wednesday is expected to raise its key interest rate for the first time in two years – on March 15, 2020, the FOMC cut it to a range between 0% and 0.25% a year. The US central bank has the difficult challenge of dealing with a high, persistent, and widespread price acceleration amid supply shocks and other turbulence caused by the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Against this backdrop, there is a certainty that the monetary authority wants to be firm in its pursuit of price stabilization but wants to be patient in observing market movements in such turbulent times. In 2022, there will still be seven monetary policy decisions by the FOMC. Most analyses expect at least five 0.25 percentage point increases in the basic interest rate this year, within a trajectory of adjustments that raise interest rates to 2.5% to 2.75% per year.
Domestic Scenario
In Brazil, this week’s focus should be the meeting of the Central Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (Copom), which is also expected to raise the basic interest rate (Selic) next Wednesday (16) from 10.75% to 11.75% per year. Today, the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) informed that the Broad Consumer Price Index (IPCA) accelerated 1.01% in February, slightly above analysts' expectations, whose median indicated a growth of 0.95%. This is the largest increase for February since 2015. The index was 0.47 percentage points higher than in January (0.54%) and accumulated a twelve-month increase of 10.54%, also above the January level (10.38%). The deterioration in inflationary expectations in the wake of commodity price shocks due to the war in Ukraine has caused analysts to revise their estimates for the Selic rate, predicting a longer cycle of higher rates to try to stabilize prices domestically, with negative side effects on economic growth for the coming years.
Last week, Petrobras announced a readjustment of 18.7% in gasoline prices, 24.9% in diesel and 16% in cooking gas (LPG) to reduce the disparity of international oil prices with those practiced domestically. The target of constant criticism by the Planalto Palace and the Legislative, the State-owned company had not changed diesel and gasoline prices for 57 days and 152 days without readjustments in the cooking gas. Yesterday, Congress mobilized to contain, in some way, this increase for the final consumer. The Chamber of Deputies and Senate approved a bill (PLP 11/2020), which changed the format of the taxation of the Tax on the Movement of Goods and Services (ICMS), making it single-phase (that is, a single taxpayer is responsible for collecting the entire chain) and with a fixed value for the entire country, instead of being a percentage of revenue. Only presidential sanction is pending. The Senate also approved another bill (PL 1472/2021) that creates a stabilization fund (price band) to contain the oscillation of fuel prices, in addition to establishing a gasoline aid of up to BRL 300 per month for low-income autonomous drivers, intended for beneficiaries of the Auxílio Brasil program. However, the president of the Chamber, Arthur Lira (PP-AL), did not seem very motivated to put it to a vote.
Another topic that may return to the spotlight is a proposal by the Executive to grant a package of subsidies to reduce the price of fuel to the final consumer. During the week, there were multiple meetings involving the president of Petrobras, Joaquim Silva e Luna, the ministers of Mines and Energy, Bento Albuquerque, of Economy, Paulo Guedes, and the Civil House, Ciro Nogueira, as well as the president of the Central Bank, Roberto Campos Neto, to discuss the theme, but the format of such subsidies was not defined.
Finally, it is noteworthy that this was another week of strong inflow of foreign capital into the country, even in a more pessimistic scenario abroad. Usually, military conflicts stimulate caution and risk aversion, which tends to harm risky assets and emerging currencies, as is the case of Brazil. However, due to the rise in commodity prices, the commodity-exporting countries are receiving voluminous inflows of foreign resources, both from productive and financial investments related to the area.
According to B3, in 2022, January and February show a net inflow of foreign funds greater than any month in 2021, namely, a balance of BRL 32.491 billion in January and BRL 30.129 billion in February. A surplus of BRL 8.444 billion was seen this month as of March 9.
BALANCE OF FOREIGN CAPITAL FLOW ON THE B3 - AS OF MARCH 9 (BRL BILLION)
Source: B3. Design: StoneX.