Quarterly Commodities Outlook is available for free now.  Download your report  →

StoneX logo

March '25 Farmer Fertilizer Focus - Urea

By: Josh Linville, Vice President- Fertilizer

March '25 UREA
 
Josh Linville
Fertilizer - Vice President
StoneX Financial Inc. - FCM Division
Major Global Urea Export Location Price Graphs

The intention of the below graphs are not to use to say "my price should be X based on this graph".  These prices are derived from an FOB price point average.  The intent is to show major global price movement trends.  Your values will likely have significant basis difference (similar to your local grain price being different than the traded market price).

This graph is labeled as MT in USD currency.

image-20250224090422-1

What everyone wants to know first, what do we think will happen going forward
GLOBAL

Where do we go from here? 

We finally saw the bullishness we had been looking for.  Tight supplies finally met demand that stepped forward and the markets got hot.  Well, since that happened, things have slowed down.  India has been dragging their feet on their anticipated purchase tender and other global buyers have gone silent.  Values have dipped a bit, though they are still higher than last edition.

My fear is that buyers are now backed into a corner.  We are nearly certain (I would say I am certain, but compliance does not like that talk!!!) that India needs to step in.  They fell significantly short of their tonnage goal in their December tender.  They fell significantly short of their tonnage goal in their January tender.  Demand I heard to be solid.  They can drag their feet a week or two, but that should be about it. 

Other global buyers must make last preparations for their spring season.  North America is no different.

On the supply side:

  • Iranian production is still offline
  • Chinese exports still do not exist
  • European production is still 75% of normal

That is a HUGE hole in the global S&D.

With all of these, I still think higher prices are on the horizon.  I just do not think there are enough pages left in the calendar for buyers to slip their way around it.  When the buying starts, I’m afraid the outcome will be higher prices.

One last point, when I look at today’s S&D, I think it is in worse shape than in late 2021/early 2022 when prices were significantly higher.  This is not to say I think prices are going back to those levels, but I do believe the actual S&D is tighter.

NORTH AMERICA

It “feels” like February imports are better than we though they would be.  When I say I thought they would be poor, I say that due to NOLA values being a discount to the world for a while.  The global S&D remains tight enough that it should not have had to force tons to N.A. if it were a discount.  However, there has been enough activity/trade that it makes me think vessels are arriving.  That is good news.

However, I’m still not sure if it is enough to be comfortable.  The first half of the fertilizer year saw imports lower than average.  Even if Jan/Feb see’s imports at their normal 1M ton range and June averages around 300K tons, March/April/May will need to average 1M tons…each. 

Is that possible?  Certainly.

Is that going to be more difficult given global supply issues?  I think so.

Don’t get me started on what happens if spring NH3 falls short…

All of this to say that I’m still on the bullish side, but I am not as confident as I have been the last couple months.  The market seems weary/scared/reluctant.  It is an odd thing when considering all the product that is missing in addition to larger demand, but it just “feels” that way.  Knowing the farmer economics are poor certainly doesn’t help anything.

 
General Global Urea Information
image 97976
image 97977
image 97978
image 97979
What has happened in the last 30 days?

Iranian production stays offline longer than expected

Our story surrounding global urea markets has been that of tight supplies.  Europe continues to produce at approximately 75% of normal which is removing 3+ million tons of production from the global S&D.  The Chinese government continues to largely ban urea exports to raise domestic urea stockpiles as well as lowering domestic urea values.  Fortunately for Chinese farmers, this strategy has worked well.  Unfortunately for global famers, this strategy has worked well.  Chinese exports are historically normal around 5 to 5.5M tons per year.  2024 saw them at a grand total of 266K.

Now, the world is having to contend with Iran having issues.

The global urea market puts a lot of weight on Chinese participation.  Their 5 – 5.5M tons typically equates to roughly 10% of the global export marketplace.  When they are participating, it creates a sense of dread and nervousness that helps to drive price ideas lower.  When they are not participating, it allows the market to rally higher. 

Rarely discussed are Iranian tons.  They have been the subject of strict tariffs that have seen many major global buyers refusing to do business.  When an Iranian price goes up or down, the market generally shrugs it off as “it’s just Iran.  It doesn’t matter.”  From a direct POV, they are correct.  However, what is missing from that approach is the fact that Iranian tons STILL affect the global S&D.

In 2024, Iran accounted for roughly 4.8M tons of urea exports.  That is VERY near the same total that China would export on a normal basis.

We started 2025 with Iranian production suffering due to gas supply issues.  These were seen as relatively short term and we, as well as many in the market, believed it would be short lived.  However, as I write this, their production STILL has not been heard returning.  As a result, approximately 400K tons are lost ever 30 days on top of losses from European and Chinese sources.

I still do not believe this will be a long-term issue…but damage is being done that will not be made up before many spring seasons.  When combined with European and Chinese shortfalls, over 1M tons of supply are being lost.  The world does not have excessive production as it has in the past so when these issues pop up, prices increase rapidly as has been seen in the last month.  Now, I do not believe we will see supply shortfalls/outages.  That is a story that has been talked out too many times in the past.  Rather, this puts the market more on edge and with higher prices. 

With spring fast approaching, this makes a hard situation much harder.

Update: Between starting this and sending it out, it appears things are finally changing for Iran.  There have been a couple vessels of urea sold with manufacturers expecting to be back online at the start of March.  This is very welcome news for the global urea market, but damage has already been done.  With production already going as hard as it can under current circumstances, their production losses will remain as a hole in the global S&D.  It helps to place a bit of a cap on the market, fundamentally should not do more than stop the rise based on it, but emotionally could see prices slide a bit as the market breathes a sigh of relief.

What does this mean for farmers?

Higher prices.  Plain and simple.

It does not matter where you are reading this from.  If you use any form of nitrogen, this affects you.  Much of the European and Chinese stories were expected at the beginning of the fertilizer year (July 1) and so were “baked in” to most S&D’s.  However, Iran was not factored in for many in the market.  If global production was running normally, then this situation could much more easily be handled with little price movement.  That is not the case.  China fell short over 5M tons of their typically exports in 2024.  European continues to create a 3+ million-ton shortfall due to high natural gas prices.

For now, urea prices have rallied and are likely to stay elevated for the short term.  Hopefully we will see Iranian production back online which would help to alleviate at least some of the stress.

India holds off on expected purchase tender in hopes of lower prices
In December, India tendered for urea with a tonnage goal of 1.5M.  They would only end up securing 187K.
In January, India again tendered for urea with a tonnage goal of 1.5M.  They would only end up securing 559K.  The east coast was very near their 500K ton goal, but the west coast suffered.
That brings us to today.  Given that these past tenders had failed and domestic demand had been heard as very good, it lead many (myself included) to believe that the would need to tender once again in mid-February.  In fact, at one point, it looked like it was happening.  There were conversations starting that usually begins their process.
Then, crickets.
Nothing has been announced.  All discussions have gone away and that has left the market wondering WTF.
That brings us to today.  Global values are certainly higher than last month's edition of this, but they have dipped from their high's.  The market was expecting a purchase battle between India and many other global buyers as everyone prepared for spring.  India played a big part in that battle, given that their purchase was more based on government subsidies than farmer profitability.  However, as much as India stepping in was going to be a driver, their dragging of feet plays just as big a part.
Now, if you ask most parties in the industry if they think India is still coming, they will give you a resounding yes.  It isn't a matter of IF they tender, it is a matter of WHEN they tender.  Now, from a fundamental POV, that means prices shouldn't dip.  Everyone knows they are going to buy eventually.  However, fertilizer can be an emotional market and that is how I see it today.  Buyers have stepped away and a deafening quiet left in its place.  As a result, prices have slide but it begs the question "what happens when demand returns".
Spring is just around the corner.  Demand is coming.
What does this mean for farmers?
Fortunately, India dragging their feet pauses and otherwise bullish market...for now.
India waiting appears to have caused others to pause.  The quiet is helping to put a little price pressure in the market.
Just do not get comfortable with this story.
It wouldn't surprise me if the announcement comes before I send this out...then we need to see how the world responds.
Peace hopes rise for Russia/Ukraine, not likely to help fertilizer short term
Trump has hit the ground sprinting since taking office.  Unlike in his first term that seems like it started with confusion on how he actually won, this term seems to be starting as though he has been planning for four years.
One of the centerpieces of his early days have been finding peace between Russia and Ukraine.  Not all parties are thrilled with the approach or the heavy handed "assistance", but he is pushing forward and it appears peace is closer now than at anytime before.
So this begs the question:  what happens to urea markets if peace is found?
There are a couple pieces to this from my POV.  
The first is the immediate response which shouldn't affect urea fundamentals.  During the early days of the invasion, there was a serious fear that Russian fertilizer would not be allowed to ship.  That is a large part of why prices spiked in late '21/early '22.  However, they ultimately did not slow down.  In fact, they picked up the pace as Russian manufacturers took advantage of high global prices.  If peace is found, I think it will calm some nerves in the market which could help lower price ideas.  
The second would be a step toward normal relations between Russia and Canada/Australia.  Both Canada and Australia placed heavy tariff's on Russian produced fertilizers and effectively blocked them from arriving directly.  If peace can be found, a next logical step should be to normal relations which includes dropping these tariff's...eventually.
The third and longer term one would be gas flows to Europe.  Now, this is a longer term situation that could result in Europe returning to normal production flows.  Russian supplies traveled thru the Nordstream pipeline.  When tensions rose, Russian shut off the pipeline.  While less than ideal for European buyers, it at least meant that if relations improved, the pipeline could open and shipments resume.  Then, someone attacked it.  Not sure which country did it but the ending result doesn't care.  The pipeline was ruptured, rendering it useless until repairs are made.  So, even if European countries and Russia were to return to normal diplomacy tomorrow, that would only mark the day that repairs can begin.  This pipeline sits under a large amount of water and the inside has been exposed to sea water which means a long stretch will need repaired.  Short term markets could slide with the excitement of normalcy returning, but it would take time before real effects took place that would bring European production back online.
What I am trying to say is that there is hope building.  I do not want to take away from a somewhat feel good story.  I just want to make sure we do not overjudge how quickly things can change.
What does this mean for farmers?
Whether prices fall because of emotional or fundamental reasons doesn't ultimately matter to farmers.  However, it is important to know the why behind it.  Emotional reasons can have shorter term effects, making the opportunity to take advantage be short.  Fundamental reasons should last longer, but could have some sellers trying to sell it as a "you better hurry up and do something now" when rushing is not needed.
Either way, it would be nice to share good news for once!
Rumors grow of Chinese exports returning, unfounded
I normally do not write about rumors in the marketplace. I would rather sit back and wait for actual stories to pop up, but China is too big a deal.   It also gave us a glimpse of what would happen.
Since late 2023/early 2024, the Chinese government has been restricting urea exports with two goals in mind:
1. provide more than adequate supplies for Chinese farmers
2. provide significantly lower urea prices to Chinese famers vs the world
This program really showed itself in 2024.  China normally exports around 5 to 5.5M tons of urea per year.  2024 saw their export total at only 262K.  
That is not a typo...
The result was exactly what the government had hoped for.  Chinese supplies grew significantly while domestic values fell.  By losing export competition, manufacturers were forced to fight in the domestic market and with supplies huge, it forced prices lower.  From a Chinese perspective, it was brilliant.  Unfortunately, the rest of the world paid the price.
In the last month, rumors started to circulate that this export restriction was going to be softened due to record stockpile levels.  Something had to give.  Either production rates had to drop or exports allowed to flow.  Some rumors tagged March as the return date.  Others tagged July.  The ultimate result?  Domestic Chinese urea values started to rise...exactly what the Chinese government did NOT want to have happen.  Especially just before their spring season.
Because of the rumors and the resulting price change, I think the government got a peek of what not to do.  If they allow exports, prices rise.  That doesn't mean they will not eventually soften their stance, just probably not right before the spring season.  If I were them, I would wait until spring was over, and then do a limited export program.  Only 1 or 2M tons allowed to export.  It alleviates some of the massive supplies while capping domestic values.  
For now and for the rest of the world, it doesn't look like change is coming soon enough to influence the spring, but it does give home for summer resets.
What does this mean for farmers?
For now, absolutely nothing.  It was nothing but a rumor and nothing has changed.
However, it does provide hope that a change is coming sooner than later.  It also shows what will happen if/when China returns.  
It doesn't matter where you farm.  Chinese export programs matter to your farm.
 
Where are current values in relation to the past

NOLA/New Orleans, Louisiana 

Number 3 global importer in 2022

image-20240826091327-1

Price comparisons

Vs 30 days ago - 8% or approximately $30 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 27% or approximately $83 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 27% or approximately $85 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 10% or approximately $38 higher

image-20250224090512-2

U.S. Midwest Average

Vs 30 days ago - 16% or approximately $66 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 28% or approximately $107 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 33% or approximately $120 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 21% or approximately $84 higher

 

U.S. Southern Plains Average

Vs 30 days ago - 13% or approximately $58 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 28% or approximately $105 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 31% or approximately $115 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 15% or approximately $65 higher

 

U.S. Northern Plains Average

Vs 30 days ago - 6% or approximately $23 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 15% or approximately $55 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 17% or approximately $61 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 1% or approximately $6 higher

 

Middle East

Number 1 exporter (as a region, not as individual nations)

image-20240826091434-3

image-20240826091459-4

image-20240826091529-5

image-20240826091558-6

Vs 30 days ago - 9% or approximately $35 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 25% or approximately $87 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 30% or approximately $100 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 16% or approximately $59 higher

image-20250224090534-3

Egypt

Number 4 global exporter in 2022

image-20240826091630-7

Price comparisons

Vs 30 days ago - 6% or approximately $28 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 31% or approximately $108 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 31% or approximately $108 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 15% or approximately $61 higher

image-20250224090548-4

 

Black Sea

Number 1 global exporter in 2022

image-20240826091656-8

Price comparisons

Vs 30 days ago - 9% or approximately $35 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 27% or approximately $85 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 30% or approximately $93 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 24% or approximately $78 higher

image-20250224090607-5

China

Number 9 global exporter in 2022

image-20240826091723-9

Price comparisons

Vs 30 days ago - 6% or approximately $16 higher

Vs 90 days ago - -4% or approximately $10 lower

Vs 6 months ago - -16% or approximately $48 lower

Vs 1 year ago - -26% or approximately $88 lower

image-20250224090622-6

Brazil

Number 2 global importer in 2022

image-20240826091747-10

Price comparisons

Vs 30 days ago - 12% or approximately $48 higher

Vs 90 days ago - 26% or approximately $90 higher

Vs 6 months ago - 26% or approximately $91 higher

Vs 1 year ago - 17% or approximately $63 higher

 

image-20250224090642-7
Bull/Bear Factors
Because no market is ever guaranteed to go higher/lower, we try to consider the factors that can sway values so that we are able to act when they occur rather than react.
Bullish Factors
  • Iranian production remains offline - 1st, we didn't expect Iranian nitrogen production to go offline.  2nd, after coming to terms with their going offline, we didn't expect them to be offline for as long as they have been.  This is the supply loss that was not expected.  Every 30 days that their production is down, the world loses a further 400K tons that the world will struggle to make up.  The global S&D is already tight.  Iran is making that worse.
  • India finally steps in to purchase - India has done a fantastic job of getting the market excited with rumors of their purchase tender, and then ripping the carpet out from under the markets feet by delaying.  That has caused a lot of angst amongst "players".  However, they cannot do this forever.  Their December tender fell very short of tonnage goals.  Their follow up January tender once again fell very short of tonnage goals.  India needs to buy...just a matter of when.
  • Chinese exports continue thin - the rumors that the Chinese government was going to allow exports to begin caused domestic values to spike.  No doubt government officials saw that and will use that information in their decision making process.  To start allowing exports to occur right before their spring season would fly in the face of the strategy they have used for over a year.  It makes sense to believe that if they allow exports, it will not be until late Q2/Q3.  That would mean nearby exports remain very thin, leading to a much tighter global S&D.
Bearish Factors
  • India continues to drag their feet, causing an uncomfortable quiet - right now, it seems more of a "when" India announces their tender rather than "if".  However, we could be wrong.  Maybe India is doing much better on stockpiles than we believe.  Maybe demand has slowed significantly, allowing imports to wait.  I do not think so, but I do not work in a world of certainty.  The longer India drags their feet, the more pressure it puts on the market.
  • Iran/China exports return - Chinese exports returning seems a very low probability situation to me short term (thru spring), but it is possible.  More possible is Iranian production returning, causing companies there to start selling product once again.  Iran returning is likely more a "taking the worst case scenario off the table" situation, meaning prices shouldn't fall (should slow the rise).  China returning would likely be seen as a very bearish event.  Again, doesn't look likely, but it would be a major disrupter.
  • Mother nature delays spring - this is something that can completely change the outlook of the market.  The market has to plan for a whole host of possibilities.  We can have a lead up to spring where everything looks extremely tightly supplied.  If spring were to start normally, serious supply concerns could pop up commonplace.  We have been there before...and then mother nature saves us.  Wet conditions for a time allows the market to move product into place that wouldn't otherwise make it in time.  I would say the market is planning for a normal spring start (as it usually does).  If it stays cold and wet which keeps fieldwork from happening, supplies can start to back up and create a lot of pressure in a short time. 
Where are the current urea/grain ratio values today

We believe that only looking at the flat price of either grains or fertilizer can be misleading:

  • Only selling grain can hurt you if fertilizer prices rise substantially
  • Only buying fertilizer can hurt you if grain prices fall

We look at the ratio "value" to get a better indication of where we are or how many bushels of X does it take to pay for 1 ton of fertilizer.

Would you rather:

  • Spend 135 bushels to pay for 1 ton of urea
  • Spend 55 bushels to pay for 1 ton of urea

When we compare the current ratio value against recent years, we start to see if we are high or low.

YOUR VALUES WILL LOOK DIFFERENT

This graph looks at the NOLA urea price vs the flat grain price. There are no logistics on either product. Your location will look different due to fertilizer logistical costs, grain basis, etc.

 

image-20250224090653-8

 

image-20250224090704-9

 

image-20250224090713-10

 

image-20250224090721-11

 

image-20250224090730-12

 

image-20250224090740-13

 

image-20250224090750-14

 

image-20250224090801-15

 

 
Josh Linville’s Focal Points
  • Iran (since they should be first to come back) - Iran is the piece that we didn't expect.  While it isn't crazy that Iranian production stopped, the fact that it has gone this long is.  An even that we thought would be a couple week ordeal has now been going a month plus.  Iran exported almost 5M tons in 2023, making it very near the same size as China who we talk a lot about.  While many around the world will not do business with Iran, their exported ton counts just as much as everyone else's for the global S&D.  The longer their production is down, the tighter supplies get.
  • China (largest missing piece, rising questions of export programs) - it seems China is getting to a decision point.  On the one hand, their stockpiles are heard to be at record levels.  Production cannot continue at their current paces without exports being allowed.  However, even the rumor that Chinese exports would be allowed caused domestic Chinese values to rise which is completely against the governments strategy.  I do not believe exports will be allowed before their spring season, but it is China.  We never truly know.  Given how the world reacts to their exports (or lack of), what the Chinese government allows or disallows will matter significantly to the world.
  • Europe (likely lower production rate for a while, gas costs worry me) - unfortunately, I do not list Europe as a "possible ramp up in production rates".  Rather, we started to fear that we would lose MORE production.  Gas values spiked and we heard that nitrate values were rising on the fear that if they didn't, further production stoppages would occur.  Since that time, gas prices have calmed...but winter is not over.  If prices start to spike again, we need to keep watch...
  • India (market knows it is coming...but when) - talk about a head fake!  It looked all but guaranteed that we would have heard India's much anticipated urea purchase tender by now.  However, they have drug their feet and surprised the world.  Unfortunately for them, they still need to buy and the world knows it.  I am concerned for what values do when they finally do step in to purchase.  Their purchase will be in direct conflict with a lot of other buyers.
  • Proximity to spring (lot of demand still to come) - time is running out for the Northern Hemisphere.  Spring season is rapidly approaching and most markets appear to be dragging their feet in high hopes that prices will slide.  Every day the calendar turns a page is another day closer to farmers hitting the fields and while farmers do not like high prices, they dislike a lack of supply significantly more.  The time for waiting games is over...

StoneX Ratio Calculation

The ratio calculation is derived from Bloomberg historical grains values as well as fertilizer values from StoneX, NPKFAS, and Argus.

The calculation is simply dividing the fertilizer price by each grain price.

All data was sourced from StoneX unless otherwise noted.

 

  • Fertilizers

This material should be construed as the solicitation of an account, order, and/or services and represents the opinions and viewpoints of the individual authors or presenters. It does not constitute an individualized recommendation or take into account the particular trading objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual customers.


The views are current only through the date stated and are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and StoneX Group Inc. (“SGI”) disclaims any responsibility to update such views. Actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those expressed or implied. Information is based on data gathered from what we believe are reliable sources. Past performance does not guarantee future results.


The StoneX Group Inc. group of companies provides financial services worldwide through its subsidiaries, including physical commodities, securities, exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivatives, risk management, global payments and foreign exchange products in accordance with applicable law in the jurisdictions where services are provided.


References to certain OTC products or swaps are made on behalf of StoneX Markets, LLC (SXM), a member of the National Futures Association (NFA) and provisionally registered with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a swap dealer. SXM’s products are designed only for individuals or firms who qualify under CFTC rules as an ‘Eligible Contract Participant’ and who have been accepted as customers of SXM.


StoneX Financial Inc. (SFI) is a member of FINRA/NFA/SIPC and registered with the MSRB. SFI is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a Broker-Dealer and with the CFTC as a Futures Commission Merchant and Commodity Trading Advisor. StoneX Financial (Canada) Inc. (SFCI) is registered in Canada and is a member of CIRO and CIPF. References to certain securities trading are made on behalf of the BD Division of SFI and are intended only for an audience of institutional clients as defined by FINRA Rule 4512(c). References to certain exchange-traded futures and options are made on behalf of the FCM Division of SFI. Wealth Management is offered through SA Stone Wealth Management Inc., member FINRA/SIPC, and SA Stone Investment Advisors Inc., an SEC-registered investment advisor, both wholly owned subsidiaries of SGI.

R.J. O’Brien & Associates, LLC (RJO) is registered with the CFTC as a Futures Commission Merchant and is a member of NFA.


StoneX Financial Ltd (SFL) is registered in England and Wales, company no. 5616586. SFL is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (registration number FRN:446717) to provide services to professional and eligible customers including: arrangement, execution and, where required, clearing derivative transactions in exchange traded futures and options. SFL is also authorized to engage in the arrangement and execution of transactions in certain OTC products, certain securities trading, precious metals trading and payment services to eligible customers. SFL is authorized and regulated by the FCA under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 for the provision of payment services. SFL is a category 1 ring-dealing member of the London Metal Exchange. In addition SFL also engages in other physically delivered commodities business and other general business activities which are unregulated and not required to be authorized by the FCA.


This communication is issued in the European Economic Area by StoneX Financial Europe GmbH (SFEG). StoneX is the trade name used by STONEX GROUP INC. and all its associated entities and subsidiaries. StoneX Financial Europe GmbH (“SFEG”) is a securities trading firm registered in Germany under Company No. HRB 80844.


StoneX Financial Pte Ltd (Co. Reg. No 201130598R) (“SFP”) is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore and is a Capital Markets Service Licence holder (for dealing in capital market products), an Exempt Financial Adviser (for advising on investment products and issuing or promulgating analyses/ reports on investment products) and a Major Payment Institution (for domestic and cross-border money transfer services).


SFP may distribute analysis/report produced by its respective foreign affiliates within the StoneX Group of companies pursuant to an arrangement under Regulation 32C of the Financial Advisers Regulations Recipients should contact SFP at (65) 6309 1000 for any matters arising from, or in connection with, this webinar.


StoneX APAC Pte. Ltd. (“SAP”) (Co. Reg. No 200616676W) is regulated as a Dealer (PS20190001002) under the Precious Stones and Precious Metals (Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing) Act 2019 for purposes of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.


StoneX Financial (HK) Limited (CE No.: BCQ152) (“SHK”) is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission for Dealing in Securities and Dealing in Futures Contracts.


StoneX Financial Pty Ltd (ACN 141 774 727) holds an Australian Financial Service License (AFSL: 345646) for Dealing in Securities, Exchange-Traded Derivatives Contracts, OTC Derivatives Contracts and Foreign Exchange Contracts, and is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.


StoneX Securities Co., Ltd. (“SSJ”) (Co. Reg. No 010401047199) is regulated by the Japanese Financial Services Agency as a Type-I Financial Instruments Business Operator (Kanto Local Finance Bureau (FIBO)No.291’), is a member of the Financial Futures Association of Japan for dealing and broking FX and FX Option transactions, and is a member of the Japan Securities Dealers Association for dealing and broking stock indices and option transactions.


Trading swaps and over-the-counter derivatives, exchange-traded derivatives and options and securities involves substantial risk and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance of any futures or option is not indicative of future success. Indicators are not a trading system and are not published as a specific trade recommendation. The information herein is not a recommendation to trade nor investment research or an offer to buy or sell any derivative or security. It does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs and does not create a binding obligation on any of the StoneX group of companies to enter into any transaction with you. You are advised to perform an independent investigation of any transaction to determine whether any transaction is suitable for you. No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of StoneX Group Inc.


The report/analysis herein is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.


© 2026 StoneX Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Satellite view of Earth at night showing illuminated cities across Asia and the Middle East

Discover more insights

Our subscribers have access to comprehensive market analysis from StoneX spanning commodities, equities, currencies and more.

StoneX: We open markets

Our market expertise, advanced platforms, global reach, culture of full transparency and commitment to our clients’ success all set us apart in the financial marketplace.

Reach

With access to 40+ derivatives exchanges, 180+ foreign exchange markets, nearly every global securities marketplace and numerous bi-lateral liquidity venues, StoneX’s digital network and deep relationships can take clients anywhere they want to go.

Transparency

As a publicly traded company meeting the highest standards of regulatory compliance in the markets we serve; our financials and record of accomplishment are matters of public record. StoneX’s commitment to “doing the right thing over the easy thing” sets us apart in the industry and helps us build respect, client trust and new partnerships.

Expertise

From our proprietary Market Intelligence platform, to “boots on the ground” expertise from award-winning traders and professionals, we connect our clients directly to actionable insights they can use to make more informed decisions and achieve their goals in the global markets.